Feb. 11, 2010
NAPUS Postmasters: Although I have been
your national president for just six weeks, I fully understand the frustrations
you face on a day-to-day basis. Those challenges were tough when I left my post
office in Hawaii six weeks ago—I know they have not gotten any better.
Specifically, I recognize that your 2009
core requirement ratings may not substantively reflect a fair assessment of
your contributions to your work unit. The decision to file for recourse is
yours. If you decide to exercise this right, the National Executive Board and I
urge you to avail yourself of the tools to which you are entitled. NAPUS
secured these tools on your behalf in order for you to be able to appeal your
evaluation in situations such as this.
The recourse process requires you to
document your concerns and rationale in the Performance Evaluation System (PES)
within 45 days of the date the rating was published to employees (Feb. 5,
2010). The deadline for filing is March 21, 2010.
We have provided updated information on
the steps to take to appeal your ratings using the eRecourse process. Go to the
NAPUS web site, www.napus.org, and click on the ÒNPA, PFP LinkÓ icon on the
home page. A copy of the appeal form also may be downloaded and filled out
should you not have access to a computer in your office.
Once you complete your appeal through
eRecourse, please print a copy of your request and send it to your chapter
president. He or she will send it to the National Office for analysis and
further action. This documentation is extremely important to help determine how
we proceed and may very well determine the future of NPA.
The National Office staff, National
Executive Board and your chapter leaders stand ready to provide you any
additional support you may need to fulfill your appeal rights.
On another note, the NAPUS Leadership
& Legislative Conference is fast approaching, March 20 – 25. As we
visit our congressional leaders, we do not want to overshadow the most
important issue confronting Postmasters and all postal employees: the
sustainability of the U.S. Postal Service.
We all know too well that, without a
viable Postal Service, there will be no universal mail service, which would
lead to fewer post offices and Postmasters. NAPUS is committed to pushing
forward legislation that will ensure an economically viable and universal
postal service to help protect PostmastersÕ jobs and continue serving the
American public.
In past congresses, NAPUS won provisions
that the USPS must consult with local management over staffing levels. We also
have secured postal responses at congressional hearings establishing timetables
for filling Postmaster vacancies. The effect the Postal ServiceÕs fiscal
position is having on our nationÕs Postmasters now requires us to rededicate
our efforts to reducing the challenges Postmasters face every day.
Recently, the Office of Inspector General
(OIG) concluded the Postal Service will overfund its pension obligations by $75
billion. Also, the OIG and the Postal Regulatory Commission estimate the Postal
Service is overpaying its retiree health obligations by $2.1 to $3.8 billion.
These are among the root causes of the increased challenges Postmasters are
facing.
We should not make the mistake of focusing
just on the symptoms to achieve short-term fixes. NAPUS is prepared to deal
with the symptoms as we work on rectifying the root causes. To achieve this, we
continue to gather factual data and supporting documents, such as those we
anticipate receiving from eRecourse appeals.
Since taking office on Jan. 1, I have
visited Capitol Hill to urge members of Congress to accurately calculate Postal
Service pension and retiree payments. I also urged them to disengage postal
relief legislation from the budget process.
During this same period, my meetings with
senior management at Postal Service Headquarters were used to establish a
working relationship conducive to finding solutions to the challenges
Postmasters face every day. I assure you I am just as focused on the need for
improved working relationships as I am focused on the need to protect the
rights, benefits and working conditions of our members.
I am committed to ensuring that NAPUS is
vocal, visible and proactive by presenting the facts with proper documentation
in a professional manner to Congress and the Postal Service. I canÕt do it
without your help, though.
Now, more than ever, is the time for NAPUS
Postmasters to unite and live up to our motto, ÒLet us do together what we
cannot do alone.Ó What can you do to help? If one or more of your core
requirement ratings do not substantively reflect a fair assessment of your
contributions, immediately file an appeal through eRecourse. I am counting on
you to follow the process and prove our employer wrong.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Rapoza, President
National Association of Postmasters of the United States